Opinion: What the Daniels case means for Alberta Métis – Edmonton Journal

    You can use your smart phone to browse stories in the comfort of your hand. Simply browse this site on your smart phone.

    Using an RSS Reader you can access most recent stories and other feeds posted on this network.

    SNetwork Recent Stories

Opinion: What the Daniels case means for Alberta Métis – Edmonton Journal

by ahnationtalk on October 5, 2015267 Views

October 5, 2015

This week, the Supreme Court of Canada will hear arguments in Daniels v. Canada. The case was initiated by the late Saskatchewan Métis leader Harry Daniels more than a decade ago to make Canada revisit its arbitrary and exclusionary policies toward the Métis and “non-status” Indians (i.e., members of First Nations who cannot be registered under the Indian Act). In the words of the trial judge, these federal policies — or lack thereof — have produced “a large population of collaterally damaged” aboriginal people who are the “most disadvantaged of all Canadian citizens.”

Specifically, the Daniels case will answer the long-standing question of whether the Métis and non-status Indians are included within the meaning of the term “Indian” in s. 91 (24) of the Constitution Act, 1867. This head of power grants “exclusive Legislative Authority” for “Indians, and Lands reserved for the Indians” to Parliament. Canada has taken an extremely narrow interpretation in relation to this jurisdiction, which conveniently excludes the Métis and non-status Indians. This exclusion has resulted in these groups falling between the jurisdictional cracks of this country.

Read More: http://edmontonjournal.com/news/national/what-the-daniels-case-means-for-alberta-metis-opinion

Send To Friend Email Print Story

Comments are closed.

NationTalk Partners & Sponsors Learn More